two stage multi attributes decision making to evaluate the sustainability of lake urmia restoration alternatives

نویسندگان

علی آذرنیوند

دانشجوی دکتری پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران محمد ابراهیم بنی حبیب

دانشیار پردیس ابوریحان دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

owing to the oncoming needs and increasing the population of lake urmia watershed, providing equilibrium  between water supply and demand seems quite challenging and the lake cannot be successful in meeting its ecological demands in this critical condition. in this unfavorable situation, water resources must be managed through a sustainable context. with this knowledge in hand, a multi attributes framework was applied to investigate the preference of supply or conservation alternatives. preference of sustainable development attributes was calculated in a pairwise hierarchical structure and instead of time-consuming conventional procedure, absolute measurement was used that compares qualitative scales instead of alternatives and can overcome the problem of rank reversal in pairwise comparison. ranks of the alternatives were evaluated by vikor method which can provide a set of compromise solutions instead of one solution. due to sensitivity analysis performance, vikor was introduced as a robust model in ranking the water resources alternatives. with regards to the results of this two-stage hierarchical-compromising approach, dealing with watershed crisis is depended on organized indigenous collaboration, water use optimization and protecting available natural resources. on the other hand, supplying water by structural development without sustainability consideration would not be effective.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Modified Approach Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using Goal Programming to Evaluate Renewable Energy Alternatives

With the continuous rise in prices in fossil fuels, companies and cities in the United States have been looking at ways to decrease their reliance on traditional energy production methods and looking more at the viability of alternative energy sources. This paper uses the goal programming and AHP multi-criteria decision making methods to aid in the selection of an optimal energy portfolio or mi...

متن کامل

Using a multi-criteria decision making approach (ANP-TOPSIS) to evaluate suppliers in Iran’s auto industry

Supplier selection is a multi-criteria problem which includes both tangible and intangible factors in these problems if suppliers have capacity or other different constraints two problems will exist: which suppliers are the best and how much should be purchased from each selected supplier? The objective of this paper is to present an integrated model and a supporting approach for effective ...

متن کامل

Robust Multi-Stage Decision Making

Testifying to more than ten years of academic and practical developments, this tutorial attempts to provide a succinct yet unified view of the robust multi-stage decision making framework. In particular, the reader should better understand: (1) the distinction between static versus fully or partially adjustable decisions; (2) the root of tractability issues; (3) the connection to robust dynamic...

متن کامل

Multi-Objective Rough Best-Worst Method to Evaluate Sustainability of a Biofuel Energy Supply Chain

The role of sustainability dimensions in the value creation process has received much attention. Adopting a proper set of key performance indicators sustainability leads to accurate calculation of chain value. This paper focuses on the dimensions of in the biofuel supply chain and seeks to evaluate the value in the chain. First, the importance of biofuels and its various types are discussed. Th...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
مرتع و آبخیزداری

جلد ۶۸، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۹۷-۲۱۲

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023